The 2025 AI Engineering Reading List

The picks from all the speakers in our Best of 2024 series catches you up for 2024, but since we wrote about running Paper Clubs, we’ve been asked many times for a reading list to recommend for those starting from scratch at work or with friends. We started with the 2023 a16z Canon, but it needs a 2025 update and a practical focus.

Here we curate “required reads” for the AI engineer. Our design goals are:

  • pick ~50 papers (~one per week for a year), optional extras. Arbitrary constraint.
  • tell you why this paper matters instead of just name drop without helpful context
  • be very practical for the AI Engineer; no time wasted on Attention is All You Need, bc 1) everyone else already starts there, 2) most won’t really need it at work

 

We ended up picking 5 “papers” per section for:

Section 1: Frontier LLMs

  1. GPT1GPT2GPT3CodexInstructGPTGPT4 papers. Self explanatory. GPT3.54oo1, and o3 tended to have launch events and system cards instead.
  2. Claude 3 and Gemini 1 papers to understand the competition. Latest iterations are Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash/Flash Thinking. Also Gemma 2.
  3. LLaMA 1Llama 2Llama 3 papers to understand the leading open models. You can also view Mistral 7BMixtral and Pixtral as a branch on the Llama family tree.
  4. DeepSeek V1CoderMoEV2, V3 papers. Leading (relatively) open model lab.
  5. Apple Intelligence paper. It’s on every Mac and iPhone.

Honorable mentions: AI2 (OlmoMolmoOlmOETülu 3, Olmo 2), GrokAmazon NovaYiRekaJambaCohereNemotronMicrosoft PhiHuggingFace SmolLM – mostly lower in ranking or lack papers. Alpaca and Vicuna are historical interest, while Mamba 1/2 and RWKV are potential future interest. If time allows, we recommend the Scaling Law literature: KaplanChinchillaEmergence / MiragePost-Chinchilla laws.

 

Section 2: Benchmarks and Evals

  1. MMLU paper – the main knowledge benchmark, next to GPQA and BIG-Bench. In 2025 frontier labs use MMLU ProGPQA Diamond, and BIG-Bench Hard.
  2. MuSR paper – evaluating long context, next to LongBenchBABILong, and RULER. Solving Lost in The Middle and other issues with Needle in a Haystack.
  3. MATH paper – a compilation of math competition problems. Frontier labs focus subsets of MATH: MATH level 5, AIMEFrontierMathAMC10/AMC12.
  4. IFEval paper – the leading instruction following eval and only external benchmark adopted by Apple. You could also view MT-Bench as a form of IF.
  5. ARC AGI challenge – a famous abstract reasoning “IQ test” benchmark that has lasted far longer than many quickly saturated benchmarks.

We covered many of these in Benchmarks 101 and Benchmarks 201, while our CarliniLMArena, and Braintrust episodes covered private, arena, and product evals (read Hamel on LLM-as-Judge). Benchmarks are closely linked to Datasets.

 

Section 3: Prompting, ICL & Chain of Thought

Note: The GPT3 paper (“Language Models are Few-Shot Learners”) should already have introduced In-Context Learning (ICL) – a close cousin of prompting. We also consider prompt injections required knowledge — Lilian WengSimon W.

  1. The Prompt Report paper – a survey of prompting papers (podcast).
  2. Chain-of-Thought paper – one of multiple claimants to popularizing Chain of Thought, along with Scratchpads and Let’s Think Step By Step
  3. Tree of Thought paper – introducing lookaheads and backtracking (podcast)
  4. Prompt Tuning paper – you may not need prompts – if you can do Prefix-Tuningadjust decoding (say via entropy), or representation engineering
  5. Automatic Prompt Engineering paper – it is increasingly obvious that humans are terrible zero-shot prompters and prompting itself can be enhanced by LLMs. The most notable implementation of this is in the DSPy paper/framework.

Section 3 is one area where reading disparate papers may not be as useful as having more practical guides – we recommend Lilian WengEugene Yan, and Anthropic’s Prompt Engineering Tutorial and AI Engineer Workshop.

 

Section 4: Retrieval Augmented Generation

  1. Introduction to Information Retrieval – a bit unfair to recommend a book, but we are trying to make the point that RAG is an IR problem and IR has a 60 year history that includes TF-IDFBM25FAISSHNSW and other “boring” techniques.
  2. 2020 Meta RAG paper – which coined the term. The original authors have started Contextual and have coined RAG 2.0. Modern “table stakes” for RAG — HyDEchunkingrerankersmultimodal data are better presented elsewhere.
  3. MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark paper – the de-facto leader, with known issues. Many embeddings have papers – pick your poison – OpenAINomic Embed, Jina v3, cde-small-v1 – with Matryoshka embeddings increasingly standard.
  4. GraphRAG paper – Microsoft’s take on adding knowledge graphs to RAG, now open sourced. One of the most popular trends in RAG in 2024, alongside of ColBERT/ColPali/ColQwen (more in the Vision section).
  5. RAGAS paper – the simple RAG eval recommended by OpenAI. See also Nvidia FACTS framework and Extrinsic Hallucinations in LLMs – Lilian Weng’s survey of causes/evals for hallucinations.

RAG is the bread and butter of AI Engineering at work in 2024, so there are a LOT of industry resources and practical experience you will be expected to have. LlamaIndex (course) and LangChain (video) have perhaps invested the most in educational resources. You should also be familiar with the perennial RAG vs Long Context debate.

 

Section 5: Agents

  1. SWE-Bench paper (our podcast) – after adoption by Anthropic, Devin and OpenAI, probably the highest profile agent benchmark today (vs WebArena or SWE-Gym). Technically a coding benchmark, but more a test of agents than raw LLMs. See also SWE-AgentSWE-Bench Multimodal and the Konwinski Prize.
  2. ReAct paper (our podcast) – ReAct started a long line of research on tool using and function calling LLMs, including Gorilla and the BFCL Leaderboard. Of historical interest – Toolformer and HuggingGPT.
  3. MemGPT paper – one of many notable approaches to emulating long running agent memory, adopted by ChatGPT and LangGraph. Versions of these are reinvented in every agent system from MetaGPT to AutoGen to Smallville.
  4. Voyager paper – Nvidia’s take on 3 cognitive architecture components (curriculum, skill library, sandbox) to improve performance. More abstractly, skill library/curriculum can be abstracted as a form of Agent Workflow Memory.
  5. Anthropic on Building Effective Agents – just a great end-2024 recap that focuses on the importance of chainingrouting, parallelization, orchestration, evaluation, and optimization. See also OpenAI Swarm.

We covered many of the 2024 SOTA agent designs at NeurIPS. Note that we skipped bikeshedding agent definitions, but if you really need one, you could use mine.

 

Section 6: Code Generation

  1. The Stack paper – the original open dataset twin of The Pile focused on code, starting a great lineage of open codegen work from The Stack v2 to StarCoder.
  2. Open Code Model papers – choose from DeepSeek-CoderQwen2.5-Coder, or CodeLlama. Many regard 3.5 Sonnet as the best code model but it has no paper.
  3. HumanEval/Codex paper – This is a saturated benchmark, but is required knowledge for the code domain. SWE-Bench is more famous for coding now, but is expensive/evals agents rather than models. Modern replacements include AiderCodeforcesBigCodeBenchLiveCodeBench and SciCode.
  4. AlphaCodeium paper – Google published AlphaCode and AlphaCode2 which did very well on programming problems, but here is one way Flow Engineering can add a lot more performance to any given base model.
  5. CriticGPT paper – LLMs are known to generate code that can have security issues. OpenAI trained CriticGPT to spot them, and Anthropic uses SAEs to identify LLM features that cause this, but it is a problem you should be aware of.

CodeGen is another field where much of the frontier has moved from research to industry and practical engineering advice on codegen and code agents like Devin are only found in industry blogposts and talks rather than research papers.

 

Section 7: Vision

Much frontier VLM work these days is no longer published (the last we really got was GPT4V system card and derivative papers). We recommend having working experience with vision capabilities of 4o (including finetuning 4o vision), Claude 3.5 Sonnet/Haiku, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and o1. Others: PixtralLlama 3.2MoondreamQVQ.

 

Section 8: Voice

We do recommend diversifying from the big labs here for now – try Daily, Livekit, Vapi, Assembly, Deepgram, Fireworks, Cartesia, Elevenlabs etc. See the State of Voice 2024. While NotebookLM’s voice model is not public, we got the deepest description of the modeling process that we know of.

With Gemini 2.0 also being natively voice and vision multimodal, the Voice and Vision modalities are on a clear path to merging in 2025 and beyond.

 

Section 9: Image/Video Diffusion

We also highly recommend familiarity with ComfyUI (upcoming episode). Text DiffusionMusic Diffusion, and autoregressive image generation are niche but rising.

 

Section 10: Finetuning

We recommend going thru the Unsloth notebooks for finetuning open models. This is obviously an endlessly deep rabbit hole that, at the extreme, overlaps with the Research Scientist track.

© 版权声明

相关文章

暂无评论

none
暂无评论...